Special report: Inside Britain's deathbonds scandal | Reuters
Why is the FSCS paying out (with some uncertainty) on Keydata - Lifemark "investments" when in the opinion of many in the case of adviser involvement the advice was flawed in the first place?
Is it fair and reasonable that Independent Financial Advisers (IFAs) who avoided these products for good reason should compensate the customers of those who did sell these esoteric and opaque "investments"?
No comments:
Post a Comment